Thursday October 30 2003 at 01:05 GMT
[Via Simon Willison] Steven Garrity details the pain he's gone through looking after his parents computer, which has quickly become infested with spyware and other junk, and asks Do we all need a personal system administrator?
I can completely empathise with him on this one. My parents are pretty good with their computer, but one of the recent virus attacks prompted me to check everything was up-to-date on their XP box. After over three hours downloading XP updates over a 56k modem, I was almost in tears. Mix in a few friends, multiply by cousins and season with uncles, and the time consumed is not insignificant.
Using the good old 80/20 rule, I think the large majority of people could be perfectly happy computer users with a significantly simplified device -- email, browser, word processor, spreadsheet, instant messenger & printing capabilities would almost cover it. Sticking that lot on a box with an auto-updating virus checker would remove so many of the support calls without noticeably impinging on flexibility. Many people happily live in this space. A carefully configured XP box can almost do the job ... but you need someone to do that initial configuration. The key word in that second sentence was could. A grand at PCWorld can buy you a whole lot of trouble: scanners, printers, webcams, a broadband connection, some wireless networking ... and you're quickly back in the personal tech support arena.
As noted in the replies to Steven's original article, somewhere in there is a fulltime job (I know -- I've looked for it quite a few times already). Here are the problems:
- people are used to referring to their local expert, getting advice for free. Suddenly charging friends fifty pounds an hour to install a virus checker is just not going to go down well.
- the job could easily become very boring. Installing a wireless router is only a challenge so many times
Comments
Powered by
thinkthin